The SA Journal Diabetes & Vascular Disease Vol 11 No 3 (September 2014) - page 41

VOLUME 11 NUMBER 3 • SEPTEMBER 2014
135
SA JOURNAL OF DIABETES & VASCULAR DISEASE
PATIENT INFORMATION LEAFLET
well as type 2 diabetes in predisposed individuals.
32
Psychological distress
and poor glycaemic control have been linked in patients with established
type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
32,35
Stress elicits the release of counter-regu-
latory hormones, such as adrenaline and cortisol, which in turn results in
energy mobilisation, often resulting in elevated glucose levels. In addition,
stress can disrupt diabetes control by negatively affecting indispensable
self-care behaviours.
36
Fortunately stress-management techniques can
play a significant role in long-term glycaemic control.
32
Diabetic patients
can therefore benefit greatly from stress-management training.
37
Cognitive impairment
Diabetes is associated with a greater rate of decline in cognitive function
and a greater risk of cognitive decline.
38,39
Findings with regard to the
contribution of co-morbid depression and diabetes to the development of
cognitive impairment have been mixed. While one study showed no sig-
nificant relationship between depression and dementia,
39
another study
with a cohort of 3 837 diabetic patients found that patients with major
depression and diabetes had an increased risk of the development of
dementia compared to those with diabetes alone.
40
With regard to the aetiology of diabetes, cognitive deficits have been
associated with chronic hyperglycaemia and frequent, severe hypogly-
caemic episodes.
41
Cognitive deficits and decline will have a direct effect
on the patient’s ability to self-care. Family involvement becomes a crucial
part of diabetes care at this point. Screening and early detection are es-
sential to ensure that adherence is not adversely affected.
THE WAY FORWARD
The clinical significance of identifying and appropriately treating psycho-
logical problems in diabetic patients is well documented. Psychosocial
adaptation is an important treatment outcome as it positively influences
quality of life and treatment efficacy.
8
Given the adverse effect of the
presence of psychological conditions on diabetes management, a com-
prehensive approach to managing diabetes is required.
A multidisciplinary team comprising relevant medical and allied health
professionals would be ideal in order to tackle the physical and psycho-
logical complexities of diabetes.
42
In addition, a patient-centred collabo-
rative treatment approach that engages with and empowers the patient
to actively participate in his/her consultations and treatment and encour-
ages open communication between patient and provider is highly rec-
ommended as a means of enlisting adherence.
8
This open collaborative
communication should include discussions about barriers to adherence,
emotional responses to diabetes and psychological factors that affect
adherence and coping. Various authors have made a case for empower-
ing patients, simply because every aspect of diabetes management is
dependent on the patient choosing to adhere.
11,43
In cases where a multidisciplinary approach is not possible, effective
screening and appropriate referral becomes essential. The psychological
problems of depression, anxiety, eating-disordered behaviour and eating
disorders discussed in this article require comprehensive psychothera-
peutic and psychopharmacological intervention. Screening for cognitive
decline and involving the family in diabetes management is essential to
ensure glycaemic control despite cognitive deficits. Addressing these
psychological presentations and recognising the role of psychology in
diabetes management can significantly improve glycaemic control and
delay and/or prevent diabetes complications.
References
1.
Department of Health. National Department of Health Strategic Plan 2010/11-
2012/13 [homepage]. 2010 [cited 2014 May 20]. Available from:
.
2.
Department of Health. Strategic Plan for the Prevention and Control of Non-
Communicable Diseases 2013-17 [homepage]. 2013 [cited 2014 may 20].
Available from:
STRAT%20PLAN%20%20CONTENT%208%20april%20proof.pdf.
3.
World Health Organisation. Non-communicable Diseases Country Profiles. World
Health Organisation, Geneva [homepage]. 2011 [cited 2014 May 20]. Available
from:
.
4.
World Health Organisation. Global status report on NCDs. Geneva [homepage].
2010 [cited 2014 May 20]. Available from:
/
publications/2011/9789240686458_eng.pdf?ua=1.
5.
Peer N, Steyn K, Lombard C, Lambert EV, Vythilingum B, Levitt NS. Rising
diabetes prevalence among urban-dwelling black South Africans.
PloS
One
2012;
7
(9): 1–9. Available from:
info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0043336.
6.
Statistics South Africa. Mortality and causes of death in South Africa, 2008:
Findings from death notification [homepage]. 2011 [cited 2014 May 20]. Available
from:
7.
Isomaa B, Almgren P, Tuomi T. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated
with the metabolic syndrome.
Diabetes Care
2001;
24
(4): 683–689. Available from:
.
8.
Snoek FJ, Skinner TC. Psychological aspects of diabetes management.
Medicine
2006;
34
(2): 61–62. Available from:
3553063843165503&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&as_vis=1.
9.
Johnson SB, Carlson DN. Diabetes mellitus. In: Kennedy P, Llewelyn S, eds. The
Essentials of Clinical Health Psychology
. West Sussex: Wiley, 2006: 159–176.
10. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of
intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term
complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
N Eng J Med
1993;
329
: 977–
986. Available from:
.
11. Jacqueminet S, Massebeouf N, Rolland M, Grimaldi A, Sachon C. Limitations of
the so-called ‘intensified’ insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes
Metab
2005;
31
: 4S45–44S50. Available from:
pubmed/16389898.
12. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, Snoek FJ, Matthews DR, Skovlund SE. Psychosocial
problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: results of the Cross-
National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) study.
Diabetic Med
2005;
22
: 1370–1385. Available from:
materials/dawn_publications/10_psychosocial_problems_and_barriers.pdf.
13. Leichter SB, Dreelin E, Moore S. Integration of clinical psychology in the
comprehensive diabetes care team.
Clin Diabetes
2004;
22
(3): 129–131. Available
from:
.
14. Penckofer S, Estwing Ferrans C, Velsor-Friefrich B, Savoy S. The psychological
impact of living with diabetes: women’s day-to-day experiences.
Diabetes Educ
2007;
33
(4): 680–690. Available from:
/
PMC3700547/.
15. Aikens JE, Wagner LI. Diabetes mellitus and other endocrine disorders. In: Camic
PM, Knight SJ, eds.
Clinical Handbook of Health Psychology: a Practical Guide to
Effective Interventions
. Cambridge, MA: Hofgrefe and Huber, 2004: 117–138.
16. Nam S, Chesla C, Stotts NA, Kroon L, Janson SL. Barriers to diabetes management:
patient and provider factors.
Diabetes Res Clin Pr
2011;
93
(1): 1–9. Available
from:
17. Harris MA, Lustman PJ. The psychologist in diabetes care.
Clin Diabetes
1998;
16
(2). Available from:
/
PG91.htm.
1...,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40 42,43,44
Powered by FlippingBook