Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  25 / 44 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 25 / 44 Next Page
Page Background

VOLUME 14 NUMBER 1 • JULY 2017

23

SA JOURNAL OF DIABETES & VASCULAR DISEASE

DIABETES CARE MODEL

forgotten areas of diabetes management (such as podiatry and

annual eye assessments, among others) are reinforced.

Having data captured onto a specifically designed program

enables us to first assess the baseline state of control in the clinic

and then monitor changes in control in subsequent years. The results

of such comparisons will help us to objectively make any further

improvements as required. The initial study conducted by Pillay

et

al.

demonstrated sub-optimal diabetes control within this diabetes

clinic.

8

The overall diabetes control has improved significantly since

the multifaceted approach was fully incorporated into the clinic.

24

Conclusion

Diabetes care in this resource-limited clinic was inadequate, with

large numbers of patients consulted by only a few rotating doctors.

This scenario has now improved to include a multidisciplinary

team (including increased numbers of doctors) coupled with a

comprehensive and standardised approach to all patients consulted

at this clinic. Based on the promising clinical outcomes shown by

Pillay

et al.

in this clinic post implementation of the multifaceted

approach, this model could serve as a possible blueprint and

could easily be adapted to other clinics, and district and regional

hospitals in the country.

24

Data sheets could be completed in other

regional or district hospital diabetes clinics in the province and sent

to the central regional hospital for capturing into this specialised

computer program. This process will provide extensive information

on diabetic patients and their control within the province. Control

of this ‘diabetes puzzle’ need not be an insurmountable task if a

multifaceted approach is attempted.

References

1. Genuth S, Eastman R, Kahn R,

et al.

Implications of the United Kingdom

Prospective Diabetes Study.

Diabetes Care

2002;

25

(1): S28–S32. DOI:10.2337/

diacare.25. 2007.S28.

2. Kirigia JM, Sambo HB, Sambo LG, Barry SP. Economic burden of diabetes

mellitus in the WHO African region.

BMC Int Health Human Rights

2009;

9

: 6.

DOI:10.1186/1472-698X-9-6.

3. Dall TM, Zhang Y, Chen YJ,

et al.

The economic burden of diabetes.

Health Aff

(Millwood) 2010;

29

(2): 297–303. DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0155.

4.

International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas

. IDF 2014.

http://www.idf.org/

diabetes atlas (accessed 8 May 2015).

5. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M,

et al.

Global, regional, and national prevalence of

overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: A systematic

analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Lancet

2014;

384

(9945):

766–781. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8.

6. Ezzati LA, Rodgers AD, Murray CJL. Comparative Quantification of Health Risks:

Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk

Factors. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.

7. Amod A, Riback W. Diabetes guidelines and clinical practice: Is there a gap?

The South African cohort of the International Diabetes Management Practices

Study.

J Endocrinol Metab Diabetes S Afr

2012;

17

(2): 85–90. DOI:10.1080/22

201009.2012.10872282.

8. Pillay S, Aldous C, Mahomed F. Diabetic patients served at a regional level

hospital: What is their clinical picture?

J Endocrinol Metab Diabetes S Afr

2015;

20

(1): 60–66. DOI:10.1080/16089677.2015.1030856.

9. Funnell MM, Brown TL, Childs BP,

et al.

National standards for diabetes self-

management education.

Diabetes Care

2009;

32

(1): S87–S94. DOI:10.2337/

dc09-S087.

10. Dudley JD. The diabetes educator’s role in teaching the diabetic patient.

Diabetes

Care

1980;

3

(1): 127–133. DOI:10.2337/diacare.3.1.127.

11. Andrews RC, Cooper AR, Montgomery AA,

et al.

Diet or diet plus physical

activity versus usual care in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: The

Early ACTID randomised controlled trial.

Lancet

2011;

378

(9786): 129–139.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60442-X.

12. Van Houtum WH, Lavery LA, Harkless LB. The impact of diabetes-related lower-

extremity amputations in the Netherlands.

J Diabetes Complicat

1996;

10

(6):

325–330. DOI:10.1016/1056-8727(95)00088-7.

13. Fong DS, Aiello L, Gardner TW,

et al.

Retinopathy in diabetes.

Diabetes Care

2004;

27

(1): S84–87. DOI:10.2337/diacare.27. 2007.S84.

14. Fox C, Coady S, Sorlie P,

et al.

Trends in cardiovascular complications of diabetes.

J Am Med Assoc

2004;

292

(20): 2495–2499. DOI:10.1001/jama.292.20.2495.

15. Guerci B, Drouin P, Grangé V,

et al.

Self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly

improves metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Auto-

Surveillance Intervention Active (ASIA) study.

Diabetes Metab

2003;

29

(6): 587–

594. DOI:10.1016/S1262-3636(07)70073-3.

16. Amod A, Ascott-Evans BH, Berg GI,

et al.

The 2012 SEMDSA Guideline for the

Management of Type 2 Diabetes (Revised).

J Endocrinol Metab Diabetes S Afr

2012;

17

(2): S1–S95. DOI:10.1080/22201009.2012.10872287.

17. Pinchevsky Y, Butkow N, Raal FJ, Chirwa T. The implementation of guidelines in

a South African population with type 2 diabetes.

J Endocrinol Metab Diabetes S

Afr

2013;

18

(3): 154–158. DOI:10.1080/22201009.2013.10844554.

18. Raaijmakers LGM, Martens MK, Bagchus C, de Vries NK, Kremers SPJ.

Perceptions of Dutch health care professionals regarding the care standard for

diabetes.

BMC Res Notes

2013;

6

: 417. DOI:10.1186/1756-0500-6-417.

19. Weingarten SR, Henning JM, Badamgarav E,

et al.

Interventions used in disease

management programmes for patients with chronic illness – which one’s

work? Meta-analysis of published reports.

Br Med J

2002;

325

(7370): 925.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.325.7370.925.

20. Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin SJ,

et al.

Interventions to improve the

management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community setting

– a systematic review.

Diabetes Care

2001;

24

(10): 1821–1833. DOI:10.2337/

diacare.24.10.1821.

21. Hayrinen K, Saranto K, Nykanen P. Definition, structure, content, use and

impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature.

Int J

Med Informatics

2008;

77

(5): 291–304. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.09.001.

22. Kim PJ, Attinger CE, Evans KK, Steinberg JS. Role of the podiatrist in diabetic limb

salvage.

J Vasc Surg

2012;

56

(4): 1168–1172. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.06.091.

23. Seedat YK, Rayner B. South African Hypertension Guideline 2011.

S Afr Med J

2012;

102

(1): 57–84.

24. Pillay S, Aldous C, Mahomed F. Improvement noted after a multifaceted aproach

to diabetes mellitus management.).

J Endocrinol Metab Diabetes S Afr

2016;

21

(1): 8–12. doi:10.1080/16089677.2015.1129704.