Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  29 / 44 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 29 / 44 Next Page
Page Background

SA JOURNAL OF DIABETES & VASCULAR DISEASE

RESEARCH ARTICLE

VOLUME 14 NUMBER 1 • JULY 2017

27

improve vasorelaxation to acetyl choline in the aorta of diabetic

rats.

10,24

Majithiya and colleagues reported that treatment with

pioglitazone reduced blood pressure, reduced oxidative stress and

restored endothelial function in STZ-induced diabetic rats. The fact

that pioglitazone reduced oxidative stress may have been a cause

of the reduction in blood pressure.

The protective effect of pioglitazone against oxidative stress

may prevent the breakdown of NO, which may improve vascular

function. Similar observations were made by Bagi and co-workers

that pioglitazone increased NO bio-availability and reduced

oxidative stress in coronary arterioles of mice with type 2 diabetes.

25

Matsumoto and colleagues reported that chronic treatment with

pioglitazone restored impaired NO-mediated, endothelium-

dependent relaxation in diabetic rat aortae.

26

It has been shown

that reduction in blood pressure in the case of STZ-induced diabetic

rats was NO mediated.

4

Calnek and co-workers reported that PPAR-

gamma agonists increased NO bioavailability in cultured cells.

27

Pioglitazone was shown to directly induce a relaxation of rat

aortae pre-contracted with phenylephrine, which was inhibited by

L-NAME.

10

Similarly, indomethacin-treated vessels incubated with

pioglitazone markedly reduced the phenylephrine contractions.

3

Although most researchers agree that the sensitivity to phenylephrine

was unchanged during the early stage of diabetes (up to 12 weeks

in STZ-induced diabetic rats), they disagree on the response to

phenylephrine. Agrawal and McNeill reported an increase in

contractility in response to phenylephrine,

28

Pfaffman and co-workers

reported a decrease,

29

and Scarborough and Carrier and White and

Carrier reported no change.

30,31

In contrast, studies that extended the

diabetic duration up to 43–52 weeks have demonstrated a consistent

increase in sensitivity to noradrenaline in rat aortae

32

and mesenteric

arteries

33

from STZ-induced diabetic rats.

In our study, we suggest that our diabetic rats did not have

enough time to develop a sufficiently severe degree of vascular

dysfunction to manifest an effect to phenylephrine. From our results,

acute pioglitazone/losartan pre-treatment did not significantly

change the maximum contractile responses to phenylephrine in the

control, diabetic or hypertensive rats.

We attempted to determine whether these drugs affected the

endothelial modulatory responses to vasoconstriction produced

by phenylephrine. Sensitivity of the aortic rings to phenylephrine

was decreased in the presence of pioglitazone and/or losartan.

The glitazones have been shown by Asano

et al

. to decrease

smooth muscle cell contractility,

34

and by Dormandy

et al

. to cause

improvement in vascular function.

35

We believe, however, that the

Figure 5.

Effects of pioglitazone and losartan on the response of aortic segments

to increasing concentrations of clonidine in the control group. Cont: control,

Pio: pioglitazone, Los: losartan, Pio+Los: pioglitazone + losartan. Values are

expressed as mean ± SEM (

n

= 14). *Cont vs Pio (

p

= 0.001); *Cont vs Los (

p

=

0.011); #Cont vs Pio+Los (

p

< 0.001).

Figure 6.

Effects of pioglitazone and losartan on the response of aortic segments

to increasing concentrations of clonidine in the HT group. Cont: control, Pio:

pioglitazone, Los: losartan, Pio+Los: pioglitazone + losartan. Values are expressed

as mean ± SEM (

n

= 5). *Cont vs Pio (

p

= 0.004); *Cont Clo vs Los (

p

= 0.014);

*Cont Clo vs Pio+Los (

p

= 0.001).

Figure 7.

Effects of pioglitazone and losartan on the response of aortic segments

to increasing concentrations of clonidine in DM group. Cont: control, Pio:

pioglitazone, Los: losartan, Pio+Los: pioglitazone + losartan. Values are expressed

as mean ± SEM (

n

= 16). *Cont vs Pio+Los (

p

= 0.005).

Figure 8.

Effects of pioglitazone and losartan on the response of aortic segments

to increasing concentrations of clonidine in the HT + DM group. Cont: control,

Pio: pioglitazone, Los: losartan, Pio+Los: pioglitazone + losartan. Values are

expressed as mean ± SEM (

n

= 13).