Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  36 / 40 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 36 / 40 Next Page
Page Background

RESEARCH ARTICLE

SA JOURNAL OF DIABETES & VASCULAR DISEASE

78

VOLUME 16 NUMBER 2 • NOVEMBER 2019

patient developed major bleeding due to upper gastrointestinal

bleeding. Five patients developed minor bleeding in group A

(three patients developed access-site bleeding and two developed

haematuria). In group B, one patient developed major bleeding in

the lower gastrointestinal system and four developed haematuria.

Discussion

Diabetic patients usually have microangiopathy and microvascular

dysfunction. After restoration of normal blood flow in the coronary

arteries, there is still insufficient myocardial tissue reperfusion (i.e.

no reflow and slow flow) in up to 30% of patients.

19,20

Higher

incidence of re-infarction, heart failure, stroke and death was

previously documented in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients.

21

The main cause of slow flow and no reflow is thrombosis and

microvascular embolisation. These microvascular complications

are higher in AMI and primary PCI. Visible thrombus in coronary

angiography can be removed by a suction catheter, but it was

found that 61% of the thrombus was invisible in AMI.

22

Imperfect

inhibition of platelet aggregation during PCI may increase the

MACE. The use of adjuvant medical drugs such as GPIs considerably

decrease the incidence of distal embolisation and thrombotic

outcomes in STEMI patients.

23,24

This study demonstrated that IC tirofiban administered for

thrombotic complications or bail-out situations, in addition to

loading oral antiplatelets in diabetic patients, was associated with

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of both groups

Group A (IV)

Group B (IC)

Parameters

(

n

= 50)

(

n

= 45)

t

/

χ

2

p

-value

Age (mean ± SD)

58.56 ± 10.18 55.90 ± 11.66

0.72

0.41

Gender,

n

(%)

Male

27 (54)

23 (51.1)

0.69

0.49

Female

23 (46)

22 (48.9)

Body mass index (kg/m

2

)

(mean + SD)

26.1 ± 6.5

25.4 ± 8.2

0.1

0.78

Smoking,

n

(%)

34 (68)

31 (68.8)

0.69

0.48

Hypertension,

n

(%)

20 (40)

19 (42)

0.08

0.78

Family history of coronary

artery disease,

n

(%)

9 (18)

7 (15.5)

0.61

0.54

Killip class > 1,

n

(%)

9 (18)

11 (24)

1.025 0.33

Aspirin,

n

(%)

49 (98)

43 (95.5)

0.05

0.87

Clopidogrel,

n

(%)

50 (100)

44 (97.7)

0.84

0.64

Beta-blockers,

n

(%)

41 (82)

39 (86.6)

0.06

0.85

ACEI or ARBs,

n

(%)

39 (78)

36 (80)

0.12

0.79

Statin,

n

(%)

44 (88)

39 (86.6)

0.15

0.73

Warfarin,

n

(%)

3 (6)

1 (2.2)

0.8

0.068

Onset-to-balloon time (min)

(mean ± SD)

167 ± 12.4

151 ± 18.3

5.8

0.089

Door-to-balloon time (min)

(mean ± SD)

46.8 ± 8.9

44 ± 7.6

1.72

0.38

Fasting glucose (mg/dl)

(mean ± SD)

168 ± 29.8

192 ± 46.6

3.64

0.074

Glycated haemoglobin

(HbA

1c

) (mean ± SD)

7.8 ± 2.2

9 ± 1.3

3.1

0.087

Creatinine (mg/dl)

(mean ± SD)

1.17 ± 0.41

1.08 ± 0.56

2.56

0.251

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

(mg/dl) (mean ± SD)

132.6 ± 46

147.09 ± 51

2.79

0.091

ACEI: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin II receptor

blocker.

Table 2.

Comparison between the groups regarding cardiac biomarkers

and left ventricular ejection fraction

Group A (IV) Group B (IC)

Parameters

(

n

= 50)

(

n

= 45)

t

p

-value

Peak CK-MB (U/l)

192.4 ± 86 155.68 ± 121 6.43 0.021*

Time to peak CK-MB (s)

12.9 ± 5.8

8.96 ± 3.2

11.4

0.001*

Peak hs-TnT (ng/dl)#

5342 ± 286

4291 ± 334

5.9

0.035*

Time to peak hs-TnT (s)

13.5 ± 3.1

9.24 ± 2.8

10.7

0.001*

50% ST-segment

resolution (%)

56

77

7.6

0.016*

LVEF at 48 hours (%)

38.6 ± 5.3

41.5 ± 3.2

0.84 0.632

LVEF at 30 days (%)

42.6 ± 4.2

48.2 ± 6.1

6.23 0.023*

Maximum C-reactive protein

level (ng/dl)

9.2 ± 2.3

5.7 ± 1.4

6.1

0.026*

#

Normal high-sensitivity troponin level up to 14 ng/dl.

CK-MB: creatine kinase-muscle/brain; hs-TnT: high-sensitivity troponin T;

LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction.

Fig. 1.

Frequency of 50% ST-segment resolution in the groups.

Fig. 2.

Comparison of TIMI flow post intervention in the groups.

Frequency

TIMI flow