Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  27 / 48 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 27 / 48 Next Page
Page Background

VOLUME 12 NUMBER 1 • JULY 2015

25

SA JOURNAL OF DIABETES & VASCULAR DISEASE

RESEARCH ARTICLE

displayed off-target LDL-C levels (≥ 1.8 mmol/l and a decrease in

LDL-C levels of < 50%), 39.7% showed low HDL-C levels, and

54.2% had elevated TG levels. In comparison, patients in the CVD

without DM group showed a higher rate of LDL-C not at target

(68.0%), decreased rates of low HDL-C (33.8%), and elevated TG

levels (38.2%). Interestingly, the ESC SCORE group with risk of ≥

10% showed a lower proportion of patients with low HDL-C and

elevated TG levels. Overall, we found that LDL-C not at goal was

the most common lipid abnormality observed in each of the four

sub-sets.

Additionally, we analysed patient lipid abnormalities using

kernel density curves for the empirical distributions of very high-

risk and non-very high-risk patient groups with regard to total

cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C (separately for men and women), and

TG levels (ESC guidelines indicated as superimposed vertical lines)

(Fig. 2). Overall, we found that the density curves were unimodal

and positively skewed, and the data indicated that the very high-

risk group showed slightly lower overall LDL-C levels than non-very

high-risk patients. Moreover, we observed that women maintained

higher overall HDL-C levels than men in both the very high and

non-very high-risk groups, while TG levels were similar between

the two risk groups.

Distributions of lipid abnormalities

Distributions of single and multiple combined lipid abnormalities

for our study are shown in Figs 3–5. Here, we present the joint

distribution of lipid abnormalities for the entire sample and then

for sub-samples of very high-risk and non-very high-risk patients.

Additionally, joint distributions that either include or exclude

patients with no lipid abnormalities are provided for each patient

group.

Fig. 3 shows that in 39.4% of patients with a total lipid profile,

there was only one single-lipid abnormality, 32.8% had two

abnormalities, and the remaining 7.3% had abnormalities in all

three assessed components of the lipid profile. Among statin-

treated patients, the most common abnormality was high LDL-C

levels (18.8% of all cases), accounting for 47.7% of all single-

lipid abnormalities. Among the 983 patients, 20.4% had no lipid

abnormalities.

Figs 4 and 5 present the joint distribution for non-very high-

risk and very high-risk patients, respectively, and indicate different

patterns of prevalence for these sub-groups. For the 261 non-

very high-risk patients with at least one abnormality depicted in

Fig. 4, 37.2% had only one lipid abnormality, 21.5% had two

lipid abnormalities and the remaining 4.2% had all three lipid

abnormalities.

Fig. 2.

Kernel density curves of lipids. Density curves were unimodal and posi-

tively skewed throughout. The data indicate that the very high-risk group (red

line, upper right panel) showed slightly lower overall LDL-C levels than non-very

high-risk patients (blue line). Moreover, we observed that women (right panel in

the middle) maintained higher overall HDL-C levels than men (left panel in the

middle) in both the very-high and non-very high-risk groups, while triglyceride

levels were similar between the two risk groups (lower panel). Density curves for

total cholesterol were mostly overlapping (upper left panel). Vertical lines mark

the cut-off point of ESC guidelines (2011); LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein choles-

terol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.