Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  18 / 44 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 18 / 44 Next Page
Page Background

RESEARCH ARTICLE

SA JOURNAL OF DIABETES & VASCULAR DISEASE

16

VOLUME 15 NUMBER 1 • JULY 2018

Table 3.

Prevalence of hypertension and relationship with other factors by gender (Caxito, 2016)

All Participants

Female

Male

(

n

= 2 354)

(

n

= 1 222)

(

n

= 1 132)

Prevalence

Prevalence

Adjusted OR

a, b

Prevalence

Adjusted OR

a, b

Associated factor

% (95% CI)*

% (95% CI)*

(95% CI)*

% (95% CI)*

(95% CI)*

Total

18.0 (16.5–19.6)

20.0 (17.8–22.3)

15.9 (13.9–18.1)

Age (years)

15–24

2.8 (1.9–4.2)

1.9 (0.9–3.9)

1

3.5 (2.2–5.6)

1

25–34

12.3 (9.9–15.2)

10.6 (7.7–14.6)

6.6 (2.8–15.4)

14.3 (10.8–18.8)

4.6 (2.6–8.2)

35–44

25.6 (21.5–72.0)

26.8 (21.4–32.9)

20.3 (8.9–46.5)

23.8 (17.7-31.2)

8.7 (4.7-16.0)

45–54

38.7 (33.4–44.4)

39.6 (32.8–39.6)

36.6 (16.0–83.8)

37.3 (28.8–46.6)

16.2 (8.7–30.0)

55–64

51.6 (45.0–58.2)

53.5 (44.9–61.9)

63.4 (27.1–147.9)

48.9 (38.7–59.1)

26.4 (13.9–50.0)

Residence

Urban

15.9 (14.3–17.6)

17.6 (15.3–20.1)

14.0 (11.9–16.4)

Rural

26.9 (23.0–31.2)

30.0 (24.4–36.2)

23.5 (18.4–29.6)

Education (years completed)

None

45.4 (38.9–52.0)

45.5 (38.8–52.4)

4.3 (1.8–10.2)

46.7 (24.8–69.9)

2.0 (0.6–6.5)

1–4

24.9 (21.4–28.7)

23.3 (19.5–27.6)

2.4 (1.0–5.4)

29.8 (22.5–38.4)

0.8 (0.5–1.5)

5–9

12.7 (10.8–14.9)

10.3 (7.8–13.6)

2.2 (0.9–5.1)

14.5 (11.8–17.7)

0.9 (0.6–1.4)

> 10

10.4 (8.2–13.1)

4.4 (2.1–8.8)

1

12.6 (9.8–16.1)

1

BMI class (kg/m

2

)

Underweight (< 18.5)

11.0 (7.8-15.3)

12.9 (8.1-19.0)

1

9.3 (5.5-15.2)

1

Normal (18.5–24.9)

15.2 (13.5–17.1)

17.0 (14.4–19.9)

1.1 (0.6–2.1)

13.7 (11.5–16.2)

1.3 (0.7–2.5)

Overweight (25.0–29.9)

25.8 (21.6–30.5)

23.9 (19.0–29.5)

1.2 (0.6–2.3)

29.2 (21.8–37.8)

2.2 (1.1–4.7)

Obese (≥ 30)

37.3 (30.2–45.0)

34.9 (27.2–43.4)

2.0 (1.0–4.1)

48.5 (32.5–64.8)

5.1 (1.9–13.4)

Abdominal obesity

No

12.1 (10.6–13.7)

12.6 (10.5–15.2)

1

11.6 (9.7–13.7)

1

Yes

35.7 (31.9–39.6)

32.5 (28.3–37.0)

1.6 (1.2-2.3)

45.7 (37.7–54.0)

2.8 (1.8–4.3)

Tobacco smoking

Non-current

17.3 (15.8–18.9)

18.9 (16.7–21.2)

15.5 (13.4–17.8)

Current

26.7 (20.2–34.4)

50.0 (34.1–65.9)

20.4 (14.0–28.7)

Alcohol consumption

No consumpion

14.2 (12.6–16.1)

18.1 (15.7–20.9)

1

9.1 (7.2–11.6)

1

Occasional (< 3 days per week)

23.5 (19.8–23.5)

21.4 (16.7–27.1)

0.9 (0.6–1.4)

26.0 (20.4–32.5)

2.5 (1.6–4.0)

Frequent (≥ 3 days per week)

25.5 (21.5–25.5)

28.0 (21.1–36.2)

1.7 (1.1–2.7)

24.3 (19.6–29.7)

2.5 (1.7–3.9)

*Post-stratification weights used as described in the methods section.

a

Adjusted for age (categorical: 15–23, 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, and 55–64).

b

Only variables with relations with statistical significance shown.

prevalence of diabetes among obese participants (17.1% in women

and 24.2% in men) and those with abdominal obesity (8.8% in

women and 24.3% in men). Men with obesity (2.4 vs underweight)

and abdominal obesity (2.3 vs no abdominal obesity) presented

higher ORs for diabetes than women (2.1 for obese vs underweight

and 1.5 for abdominal obesity) (Table 4).

For current smokers and occasional consumers of alcohol the

prevalenceof diabeteswas higher, butwithno significant relationship

(Table 4). No significant relationships were found with education,

residence, BMI, abdominal obesity, tobacco smoking and alcohol

consumption; however, the prevalence of hypercholesterolaemia

was higher among less educated individuals, the obese, smokers

and frequent alcohol drinkers (Table 5).

The majority of the population (61.5%;

n

= 1 460) reported

previous measures of blood pressure, and nearly half (48.5%) of

the hypertensive participants were aware of their condition. Only

32.5% of the aware hypertensive participants were on treatment

and 57.7% of them had their blood pressure controlled. This

represented only 9.1% of all hypertensive participants (Fig. 1).

Only 7.3% (

n

= 172) of the population reported previous

measurement of glycaemia, with a low awareness rate of 10.8%

among participants with diabetes in this study. Of the aware

participants, 41.7% were receiving treatment (4.5% of all

hyperglycaemic participants) and 60.0% had a controlled blood

sugar level (Fig. 1). Only 2.9% (

n

= 68) of participants reported

previous measures of cholesterolaemia and only 4.2% of individuals

with hypercholesterolaemia were aware of their condition (Fig. 1).

The hypertension awareness rate was higher among women

(62.7%; 95% CI: 55.9–69.0) and older participants, without

a difference regarding education level (Table 6). The diabetes

awareness rate was higher among men (58.3%; 95% CI: 38.8–

75.5), older participants and those with higher education levels

(Table 7). The hypercholesterolaemia awareness rate was higher

among women (66.7%; 95% CI: 20.8–93.9), older age groups

and higher education levels (Table 8). The treatment rate of all

conditions was more prevalent in the older age groups and higher

education levels, but the control rate was more frequent in younger

participants.

Among the individuals who were aware of any of the three

conditions, the advice most often given by healthcare professionals

to follow non-pharmacological approaches for the management

of cardiovascular risk factors was a change in dietary habits, with

a decrease in salt and fat intake, and increased fruit and vegetable

intake (Table 9).