Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  9 / 48 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 9 / 48 Next Page
Page Background

SA JOURNAL OF DIABETES & VASCULAR DISEASE

RESEARCH ARTICLE

VOLUME 14 NUMBER 2 • DECEMBER 2017

47

off points for WC (98 cm in men; 85 cm in women) that correspond

to a BMI of 30 kg/m

2

. Europid WC cut-off points (≥ 80 cm in women;

≥ 94 cm in men), as recommended by the IDF9 and currently used

in sub-Saharan Africa to define central obesity do not appear to

correlate with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m

2

in Botswana. Elsewhere, there is a

strong correlation between BMI of 25–34.9 kg/m

2

, WC ≥ 102 cm

for men and ≥ 88 cm for women, and greater risk of hypertension,

type 2 diabetes, dyslipidaemia and coronary heart disease.

20

Western countries derived cut-off values of WC from

correlation with BMI, whereas Asians tried to define WC cut-off

values produced by receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve

analysis.

21,22

Measurements of skinfold thickness are less accurate,

particularly in obese individuals and are therefore discouraged

in routine screening exercises, except in epidemiological studies.

Precise measurements of body fat using computed tomography

(CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans or biochemical

barometers such as adipokines are unlikely to be used outside

research settings in Botswana. However, measurement of fasting

insulin and glucose levels may help in the calculation of HOMA-IR

in individuals with features of insulin resistance syndromes.

In the Diabetes and Macrovascular Complications study of

258 adult diabetic patients in Botswana,

1

the MetS defined using

IDF criteria

9

was more prevalent in diabetic women compared to

diabetic men. Depending on which set of parameters in the IDF

criteria was used for the definition, the prevalence of the MetS

ranged from 41.7–83.7% in men, and 37.8–88.6% in women.

Obesity, defined by waist:hip ratio (> 0.9 in men, > 0.85 in women)

was present in 87.9% of diabetics, and by WC (> 94 cm men, > 80

cm in women) in 79.0% of diabetics, but prevalence of the MetS

dropped to 38.3% using BMI (> 30 kg/m

2

). Large disparities in

estimates of the MetS based on different parameters complicated

its true prevalence estimates in that study. BMI was viewed as an

insensitive indicator of the MetS, especially in diabetic women.

Garrido

et al.

2

conducted a small cross-sectional, observational

study of 150 hospital workers at a peripheral facility in Botswana,

representing nearly half of the hospital workforce, women

comprising over 70% of the group. The investigators applied any

three or more of the ATP III criteria for definition of the MetS.

23

Low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol affected 80% of the

group, dysglycaemia 73.3%, hypertension 44%, central obesity

42% and hypertriglyceridaemia 14%. A third of the participants

met the ATP III criteria for the MetS and 28.7% had a BMI > 30

kg/m

2

. That over 40% of hospital employees had central obesity,

using higher cut-off points for WC raises the possibility of a high

prevalence of abdominal obesity in the community.

Another cross-sectional study by Malangu

3

looked at 190

adult HIV-infected patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy

(HAART) at Princess Marina Hospital in Gaborone in 2010. Their

mean age was 42 ± 9.04 years and nearly threequarters of the

group were women (74.2%). Using IDF criteria, the investigator

showed an overall prevalence of the MetS in 11.1% of participants.

Risk factors for the MetS included increased age, male gender

Table 1.

Relative risks of hypertension, dysglycaemia and

dyslipidaemia for different BMI categories versus normal weight

(BMI < 25 kg/m

2

) among 418 patients

(1) Hypertension, (2) dysglycaemia,

(3) dyslipidaemia

WHO BMI category (kg/m

2

) Relative risk 95% CI

p

-value

Overweight (25–29.9)

(1) 0.99

(0.78–1.27)

0.95

(2) 0.94

(0.61–1.45)

0.78

(3) 1.24

(0.79–1.96)

0.36

Grade I (30–34.9)

(1) 1.09

(0.87–1.38)

0.45

(2) 0.88

(0.57–1.36)

0.57

(3) 1.24

(0.79–1.95)

0.36

Grade II (35–39.9)

(1) 1.12

(0.88–1.43)

0.45

(2) 1.01

(0.65–1.59)

0.95

(3) 1.07

(0.66–1.74)

0.77

Grade III (> 40)

(1) 1.06

(0.82–1.38)

0.64

(2) 1.02

(0.64–1.62)

0.94

(3) 1.23

(0.76–1.98)

0.40

WHO, World Health Organisation; BMI, body mass index.

Table 2.

Relative risks of any cardiovascular disease for different

waist circumference categories versus current reference waist

circumferences (< 80 cm in women; < 94 cm in men)

Any CVD relative risk

Waist circumference

category (cm)

Relative risk

95% CI

p

-value

Category 2

Men (94–101.9)

1.04

(0.91–1.18)

0.61

Women (80–87.9)

1.15

(0.84–1.59)

0.39

Category 3

Men (> 102)

1.10

(0.99–1.22)

0.08

Women (> 88)

1.17

(0.86–1.58)

0.32

CVD, cardiovascular disease refers to hypertension, dysglycaemia and dysli-

pidaemia.

ZARTAN CO 50/12,5, 100/25.

Each tablet contains 50, 100 mg losartan potassium respectively and 12,5,

25 mg hydrochlorothiazide respectively. S3 A42/7.1.3/1068, 1069. NAM NS2 12/7.1.3/0070, 0071. For full

prescribing information, refer to the package insert approved by the Medicines Control Council, 5 August

2011.

ZNCL322/09/2017.

CUSTOMER CARE LINE

0860 PHARMA (742 762) / +27 21 707 7000

www.pharmadynamics.co.za