Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  17 / 44 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 17 / 44 Next Page
Page Background

VOLUME 11 NUMBER 4 • NOVEMBER 2014

151

SA JOURNAL OF DIABETES & VASCULAR DISEASE

REVIEW

Excess cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes:

do we need to look beyond LDL cholesterol?

ALAN REES

Correspondence to: Dr Alan Rees

Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK

Tel: +44 (0)29 20743000

e-mail:

alan.rees2@wales.nhs.uk

Previously published in

Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis

2014;

14

: 10–20

S Afr J Diabetes Vasc Dis

2014;

11

: 151–159

Abstract

Despite impressive advances in treatment, cardiovascular

disease (CVD) remains a significant healthcare burden in

the UK and worldwide. The clustering of CVD risk factors

in patients with type 2 diabetes underlines the need for a

multifactorial treatment approach, yet even when receiving

optimal therapy according to best standards of care, there

remains a substantial risk of CVD and microvascular disease.

Risk-prediction tools traditionally provide an estimate of

risk over 10 years, however this approach is dominated by

chronological age and gender and has a number of recognised

limitations. A move from 10-year to lifetime risk calculation

has been proposed, and should encourage intervention at a

much earlier stage. This move, alongside aggressive and broad

control of modifiable risk factors, aims to ease the burden of

atherosclerosis prior to the manifestations of CVD. This will

be of particular benefit to those with type 2 diabetes, who

have been exposed to hyperglycaemia and other risk factors

for extended periods of time. The atherogenic dyslipidaemia

common in this group also ensures they will benefit most from

treatment strategies under investigation to further reduce

macro- and microvascular risk.

Keywords:

residual risk, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes,

lifetime risk, atherogenic dyslipidaemia, macrovascular

Introduction

Annual mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD) has almost

halved in the UK in the last 50 years, to about 180 000 people in

2009 – representing a fall from 51 to 32% of all-cause mortality.

1

Nevertheless, CVD remains the leading cause of death both in the

UK1 and world wide.

2

However, this progressive decrease in CVD

mortality is being attenuated by the counterbalancing increase in

obesity, the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes.

The prevalence of obesity has been increasing exponentially

over the past two decades,

3

and is the most prevalent metabolic

disease worldwide.

4

This increase in obesity is fuelling a rise in the

numbers of people with metabolic syndrome or type 2 diabetes,

5,6

with prevalence estimates for the metabolic syndrome varying

between 20 and 30% of adults

7

and diabetes affecting 8.3% of the

global population.

5,8

Until recently type 2 diabetes was considered

to be a disease of adulthood, however over the past two decades

an increase in children and adolescents has been reported – from

< 3% of all cases of new-onset diabetes in adolescents in 1990 to

45% in 2005.

9

Young people with this disorder have an increased

risk of morbidity and mortality during the most productive years of

life.

10,11

As coronary disease is the major cause of death associated

with diabetes,

12,13

it may be expected that the observed mortality

decline would also be reflected in patients with diabetes. However,

a large cohort study based in the USA showed that cardiovascular

mortality rates in men with diabetes have not decreased to the

same extent as those seen in the general population, and have even

increased among women.

14

The combined increase in prevalence of obesity, the metabolic

syndrome and diabetes is having tangible effects on coronary

heart disease (CHD) mortality. Recent epidemiological data from

1984 to 2004 in the UK show a significant overall reduction in

CHD mortality among adults, but in younger men, mortality rates

increased in 2002 for the first time in over two decades. This was

reflected in data for both men and women aged 45 to 54 where a

slowing of the decline in mortality rates was observed, with trends

reflected in data from the USA.

15

Unfavourable trends in risk factors

for CHD were considered a likely explanation for the observed

mortality rates.

15,16

The increasing prevalence of diabetes and its attendant CVD

risk makes management of this disease and its complications

of paramount importance. Type 2 diabetes is a complex disease

defined by hyperglycaemia due to insulin resistance and progressive

beta-cell failure. Among the first studies to confirm independent

associations between glycated haemoglobin (HbA

1c

) and vascular

complications, including cardiovascular complications, were the

landmark UKPDS (UK Prospective Diabetes Study)

17

and its long-term

follow-up analysis.

18

This association has also been highlighted in

a number of large population-based observational studies,

19-21

and

was subsequently quantified in a large meta-analysis including data

from almost 700 000 patients. The meta-analysis found that serum

glucose is independently associated with an increased risk of CHD

(HR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.83–2.19), ischaemic stroke (HR: 2.27, 95%

CI: 1.95–2.65) and an aggregate of other vascular deaths (HR:

1.73, 95% C:I 1.51–1.98).

22

The financial burden of excess CVD in type 2 diabetes

The cost burden of diabetes mellitus to the National Health Service

(NHS) is estimated to be up to 10% of the total resource expenditure,

with a recent study estimating the annual cost in 2010/2011 to be

around £9.8 billion.

23

Type 2 diabetes was responsible for around

90% of this cost, with less than a quarter relating to the treatment

and ongoing management of diabetes and the remainder accounted

for by treating its complications.

23

The large hospital-care burden is a

result of the treatment of retinal, renal, neuropathic, cerebrovascular

and cardiac complications, which occur with increasing frequency

and severity as the disease progresses.

24

For example, a study conducted into secondary care treatment

for patients with diabetes in Wales found that those with diabetes

represented over a quarter of nephrology admissions and almost